Structural affect theory is an approach to understanding how media texts generate affective responses, such as suspense, curiosity, and surprise, in their audiences (Carroll, 1996; Plantinga, 2009; Smith, 2014). This theory emphasizes the role of the narrative structure of a media text, as well as the way that it is presented, in shaping emotional responses in viewers or readers.
One key element of structural affect theory is the idea that suspense is generated through the manipulation of information. Media texts may withhold certain information from the audience, or provide it in a piecemeal fashion, in order to create a sense of anticipation and tension (Plantinga, 2009). This can be achieved through techniques such as foreshadowing, cliffhangers, and red herrings.
Another important aspect of the theory is the idea that curiosity is generated through a sense of uncertainty or ambiguity. Media texts may present puzzles or mysteries that the audience is encouraged to solve, creating a sense of engagement and investment (Smith, 2014). This can be achieved through techniques such as enigmas, riddles, and complex characters or plots.
Finally, surprise is seen as a key element of affective response in media texts. Media can create surprise through the unexpected, such as plot twists or sudden reversals, or through the inversion of expectations (Carroll, 1996). This can be achieved through techniques such as irony, satire, and subversion.
Critics of structural affect theory have argued that it places too much emphasis on the narrative structure of media texts, and not enough on the cultural, social, or historical context in which they are produced and consumed (Ang, 2012). Others have suggested that the theory may be too focused on the formal aspects of media, and not sufficiently attentive to the affective responses of individual viewers or readers (Klevjer, 2006). Additionally, some have criticized the theory for being overly deterministic, assuming that all viewers will respond in the same way to the same stimuli (Smith, 2014).
In conclusion, while structural affect theory offers valuable insights into the ways in which media texts can generate affective responses in their audiences, it is important for media students to be aware of its limitations and to consider other approaches to media analysis as well.
References:
Ang, I. (2012). Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge.
Carroll, N. (1996). Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge University Press.
Klevjer, R. (2006). “What’s the Matter with Cognition?” — A Critique of Stereotypical Notions in Film Theory. Projections, 1(1), 25-38.
Plantinga, C. (2009). Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. University of California Press.
Smith, M. (2014). Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford University Press.